Today, I was directed at David Chartier’s post about the pricing and marketing of the upcoming Google Glass(es). In less words than even he uses: Google should be getting flamed for how they are marketing/pricing those things.
So, why aren’t they? My totally unscientific thoughts (the below list addresses companies solely based on my thoughts about their hardware lines):
- Google Glass is a brand new product. It’s not a smaller computer (iPad). It’s not a phone with 1,000 new features (iPhone). Google Glass would be a brand new product. That changes expectations.
- Google isn’t Apple. Let’s remember that forever.
- A person who is interested in Google hardware (not Android, Google) is a different person than a person who is interested in Apple’s hardware.
- To that end… Apple is as consumer as consumer can get. If an Apple product in a given market isn’t the standard, it is, at the very least, the “attainable aspiration.” This is what sells Apple products. This is an Apple win.
- Since there’s no expectation for a Google product that is the next big, new, life-changing thing to be an “attainable aspiration,” Google gets to bend the laws of marketing, pricing, and a host of other considerations that Apple must be careful about. Thus, no mass-flaming for the excessive price tags or time to market.
Now that’s not to say that Google is “doing it right” or that Apple is “too consumer to be successful.” They just exist in different ecosystems.
Good for both companies for playing in those ecosystems well.
